SavitriStudy wiki

The Journey in Eternal Night and the Voice of the Darkness

Book 9, Canto 2 — and the close of The Book of Eternal Night. Savitri enters Death's own country and the first round of the argument is fought. The canto is structured as a debate: four speeches from Death and three replies from Savitri, the last reply ending the round on a claim — Then was man born among the monstrous stars / Dowered with a mind and heart to conquer thee — that Death does not answer. The canto's first concrete gain is also won here: Death, treating the concession as a way to send Savitri home satisfied, grants the first boon — the restoration to Satyavan's blind father Dyumatsena of his kingdom, his sight, and his lost royal life. The deeper concession Savitri actually wants — Satyavan's own return — is refused, but the form of boons granted has been established. Books 10 and 11 will extend it.

This is the first half of the great central argument of the epic. Death's case is the case of the negating Absolute — I, Death, am He; there is no other God. Savitri's case is that the negating Absolute is not the whole; it is the back of a positive God whose name is love and whose work is being done through her. The argument is metaphysical at its highest pitch and emotional at its deepest. By its end Death is silent.

What the canto is doing

It is doing the work that the title of Towards the Black Void|the previous canto only pointed to — the actual journey through Eternal Night. The country is described with sustained force: the smothering Nought, the immense refusal of the eternal No, the long stretches in which Savitri loses sight of both Death and Satyavan and is "Lost in a blindness of extinguished souls." Sri Aurobindo's claim about the standing reached in The Discovery of the Cosmic Spirit and the Cosmic Consciousness is being tested here: she lived in spite of death, she conquered still.

It is also setting the terms of the long argument. Each of Death's four speeches is a different version of the same case — that manifestation is unreal, that love is illusion, that the Witness is indifferent, that Death is the only Real. Each of Savitri's replies refuses the premise. The canto is doing the philosophical work of laying out the positions; Books 10 and 11 will work through their consequences.

The plunge

The canto opens with the three figures at the brink:

AWHILE on the chill dreadful edge of Night All stood as if a world were doomed to die And waited on the eternal silence' brink… But still in its lone niche of templed strength Motionless, her flame-bright spirit, mute, erect, Burned like a torch-fire from a windowed room Pointing against the darkness' sombre breast.

She advances first:

The Woman first affronted the Abyss Daring to journey through the eternal Night. Armoured with light she advanced her foot to plunge Into the dread and hueless vacancy; Immortal, unappalled, her spirit faced The danger of the ruthless eyeless waste.

Sri Aurobindo's diction is precise: she does not enter, she plunges; she is not equipped, she is armoured with light. The country itself is then described as a deliberate annulment of every faculty:

A mystery of terror's boundlessness, Gathering its hungry strength the huge pitiless void Surrounded slowly with its soundless depths, And monstrous, cavernous, a shapeless throat Devoured her into its shadowy strangling mass…

The thought-stopping pressure of the country is described with one of the canto's most direct sentences:

In the smothering stress of this stupendous Nought Mind could not think, breath could not breathe, the soul Could not remember or feel itself; it seemed A hollow gulf of sterile emptiness, A zero oblivious of the sum it closed, An abnegation of the Maker's joy Saved by no wide repose, no depth of peace.

The line Saved by no wide repose, no depth of peace is doctrinally important. This is not the peace of Nirvana and the Discovery of the All-Negating Absolute; this is empty nirvana — the negation without the cosmic affirmation that Book 7 Canto 7 found. The country is the worst version of what the Voice of Night in Book 7 had offered. Sri Aurobindo wants the reader to see that Savitri is being put through, again and at higher pressure, what she already overcame.

The disappearance

She loses sight of everything:

As disappears a golden lamp in gloom Borne into distance from the eyes' desire, Into the shadows vanished Savitri. There was no course, no path, no end or goal: Visionless she moved amid insensible gulfs… There was none with her in the dreadful Vast: She saw no more the vague tremendous god, Her eyes had lost their luminous Satyavan.

The line her eyes had lost their luminous Satyavan names the worst threat of the country. Not pain, not annihilation, but the lost sight of the one she has come for. Sri Aurobindo notes the durations in psychological time:

Long hours, since long it seems when sluggish time Is measured by the throbs of the soul's pain, In an unreal darkness empty and drear She travelled treading on the corpse of life, Lost in a blindness of extinguished souls. Solitary in the anguish of the void She lived in spite of death, she conquered still…

The gleam

The reversal comes as a small light:

At first a faint inextinguishable gleam, Pale but immortal, flickered in the gloom As if a memory came to spirits dead, A memory that wished to live again, Dissolved from mind in Nature's natal sleep.

The reaction of the darkness is one of the canto's most striking images:

It wandered like a lost ray of the moon Revealing to the night her soul of dread; Serpentine in the gleam the darkness lolled, Its black hoods jewelled with the mystic glow; Its dull sleek folds shrank back and coiled and slid, As though they felt all light a cruel pain And suffered from the pale approach of hope.

Night is here a serpent with black hoods. The light enters it as a pain. Sri Aurobindo gives the Night her own response — a personified, frightened resistance:

Night felt assailed her heavy sombre reign; The splendour of some bright eternity Threatened with this faint beam of wandering Truth Her empire of the everlasting Nought. Implacable in her intolerant strength And confident that she alone was true, She strove to stifle the frail dangerous ray…

But the light wins:

But still the light prevailed and still it grew, And Savitri to her lost self awoke; Her limbs refused the cold embrace of death, Her heart-beats triumphed in the grasp of pain; Her soul persisted claiming for its joy The soul of the beloved now seen no more. Before her in the stillness of the world Once more she heard the treading of a god, And out of the dumb darkness Satyavan, Her husband, grew into a luminous shade.

Satyavan reappears. The three formation is restored. And now Death speaks.

Death's first speech — the home of Night

His first speech is the announcement of the country:

"This is my silent dark immensity, This is the home of everlasting Night, This is the secrecy of Nothingness Entombing the vanity of life's desires. Hast thou beheld thy source, O transient heart, And known from what the dream thou art was made? In this stark sincerity of nude emptiness Hopest thou still always to last and love?"

The argument is one of origin: this is where you came from and what you are made of — emptiness. Hope of permanence and love is therefore a category mistake. Savitri's first reply is not in words:

The Woman answered not. Her spirit refused The voice of Night that knew and Death that thought. In her beginningless infinity Through her soul's reaches unconfined she gazed; She saw the undying fountains of her life, She knew herself eternal without birth.

Eternal without birth. The metaphysical position is being held in silence. The Voice of Night's claim that she was made from emptiness is refused at the level where origin is no longer the question — what she is has no birth.

Death's second speech — the gifts

Death speaks again, longer:

"Although thou hast survived the unborn void Which never shall forgive, while Time endures, The primal violence that fashioned thought, Forcing the immobile vast to suffer and live, This sorrowful victory only hast thou won To live for a little without Satyavan."

The speech then opens the long case against manifestation. It is one of the most polished passages of metaphysical complaint in the poem:

"A fragile miracle of thinking clay, Armed with illusions walks the child of Time. To fill the void around he feels and dreads, The void he came from and to which he goes, He magnifies his self and names it God. He calls the heavens to help his suffering hopes. He sees above him with a longing heart Bare spaces more unconscious than himself… The gods who watch the earth with sleepless eyes And guide its giant stumblings through the void, Have given to man the burden of his mind; In his unwilling heart they have lit their fires And sown in it incurable unrest… His mortality vexing with the immortal's dreams, Troubling his transience with the infinite's breath, They gave him hungers which no food can fill; He is the cattle of the shepherd gods."

The case is severe and not without dignity. He is the cattle of the shepherd gods. Sri Aurobindo has Death give the entire pessimist tradition's central indictment — the gods have cursed man with aspirations whose objects do not exist. The speech ends with a concrete offer:

"Yet since thy strength deserves no trivial crown, Gifts I can give to soothe thy wounded life. The pacts which transient beings make with fate, And the wayside sweetness earth-bound hearts would pluck, These if thy will accepts make freely thine. Choose a life's hopes for thy deceiving prize."

Choose a life's hopes for thy deceiving prize. Death's first specific tactic: offer her something less than Satyavan to get her to leave. The canto's first transactional moment is set up.

Savitri's first speech — the refusal of the mask

Savitri now speaks. Her first speech is a refusal and a demand:

"I bow not to thee, O huge mask of death, Black lie of night to the cowed soul of man, Unreal, inescapable end of things, Thou grim jest played with the immortal spirit. Conscious of immortality I walk."

The phrase huge mask of death is structurally important. She is naming Death as a mask. The being behind the mask is something else. The rest of the argument depends on this — Death is a figure, not the final fact. Her own position:

"A victor spirit conscious of my force, Not as a suppliant to thy gates I came: Unslain I have survived the clutch of Night. My first strong grief moves not my seated mind; My unwept tears have turned to pearls of strength: I have transformed my ill-shaped brittle clay Into the hardness of a statued soul."

My unwept tears have turned to pearls of strength. The whole Book of Yoga is being claimed in one image: the grief of Book 7 Canto 1 has not been bypassed; it has been transmuted. What was tears is now strength.

The demand follows. It is tactically minimal:

"First I demand whatever Satyavan, My husband, waking in the forest's charm Out of his long pure childhood's lonely dreams, Desired and had not for his beautiful life. Give, if thou must, or, if thou canst, refuse."

She does not ask for Satyavan's return. She asks for what he desired and did not have — the restoration of his father's lost kingdom. Sri Aurobindo's strategic point is precise: she is opening with a claim Death can refuse without losing the argument, knowing he will not refuse it because the refusal would be petty.

The first boon

Death grants it. The scorn in his voice is itself a sign of the canto's structure: he treats the gift as a way of sending her home:

Death bowed his head in scornful cold assent, The builder of this dreamlike earth for man Who has mocked with vanity all gifts he gave. Uplifting his disastrous voice he spoke: "Indulgent to the dreams my touch shall break, I yield to his blind father's longing heart Kingdom and power and friends and greatness lost And royal trappings for his peaceful age, The pallid pomps of man's declining days, The silvered decadent glories of life's fall… Back from the grandeur of my perilous realms Go, mortal, to thy small permitted sphere!"

The boon is real — Dyumatsena will be restored, sight, kingdom, dignity. But Death's intent is to use the boon as a closing-out. Go, mortal, to thy small permitted sphere. He thinks he has bought her off.

Savitri's second speech — the equal birth

He has not:

"World-spirit, I was thy equal spirit born. My will too is a law, my strength a god. I am immortal in my mortality. I tremble not before the immobile gaze Of the unchanging marble hierarchies That look with the stone eyes of Law and Fate. My soul can meet them with its living fire."

World-spirit, I was thy equal spirit born. The claim is fully made. She is not Death's subject; she is his equal. The argument turns on this claim — if she is his equal, then his refusal is not the end of the matter.

Her actual demand is now stated:

"Out of thy shadow give me back again Into earth's flowering spaces Satyavan In the sweet transiency of human limbs To do with him my spirit's burning will. I will bear with him the ancient Mother's load, I will follow with him earth's path that leads to God. Else shall the eternal spaces open to me, While round us strange horizons far recede, Travelling together the immense unknown. For I who have trod with him the tracts of Time, Can meet behind his steps whatever night Or unimaginable stupendous dawn Breaks on our spirits in the untrod Beyond. Wherever thou leadst his soul I shall pursue."

The demand has two limbs. Either give him back, or open the eternal spaces to her so that she can follow him into them. Either way she will not leave him. The line Wherever thou leadst his soul I shall pursue is the standing claim of the rest of the argument — Death's only options are restoration or company.

Death's third speech — the universal cry

Death's reply is given as cosmic violence:

Out of the rolling wastes of night there came Born from the enigma of the unknowable depths A voice of majesty and appalling scorn. As when the storm-haired Titan-striding sea Throws on a swimmer its tremendous laugh Remembering all the joy its waves have drowned, So from the darkness of the sovereign night Against the Woman's boundless heart arose The almighty cry of universal Death.

The speech is the most frightening of his four:

"Hast thou god-wings or feet that tread my stars, Frail creature with the courage that aspires, Forgetting thy bounds of thought, thy mortal role? Their orbs were coiled before thy soul was formed. I, Death, created them out of my void; All things I have built in them and I destroy. I made the worlds my net, each joy a mesh. A Hunger amorous of its suffering prey, Life that devours, my image see in things. Mortal, whose spirit is my wandering breath… Blind slave of my deaf force whom I compel To sin that I may punish, to desire That I may scourge thee with despair and grief And thou come bleeding to me at the last…"

The doctrine is severe — Death compels sin in order to punish it. The world is Death's hunger as it preys on itself. He threatens her:

"Lest in their sombre shrines thy tread awake From their uneasy iron-hearted sleep The Furies who avenge fulfilled desire. Dread lest in skies where passion hoped to live, The Unknown's lightnings start and, terrified, Lone, sobbing, hunted by the hounds of heaven, A wounded and forsaken soul thou flee Through the long torture of the centuries…"

The threat is of cosmic pursuit — that if she persists, she will spend many lifetimes being hunted by avenging powers for the trespass. Then a second offer:

"I will take from thee the black eternal grip: Clasping in thy heart thy fate's exiguous dole Depart in peace, if peace for man is just."

He offers her release from the grip of attachment — the standard mystical promise of liberation through detachment. Take it; go.

Savitri's third speech — the God of love

Her reply is the canto's first turn toward the affirmative metaphysics:

"Who is this God imagined by thy night, Contemptuously creating worlds disdained, Who made for vanity the brilliant stars? Not he who has reared his temple in my thoughts And made his sacred floor my human heart. My God is will and triumphs in his paths, My God is love and sweetly suffers all."

The line My God is love and sweetly suffers all is the canto's first explicit naming of Sri Aurobindo's central counter-doctrine. Death's God is indifferent power; Savitri's God is love that suffers. The two Gods are not the same God seen under two aspects; they are different descriptions of the same Reality, and the description matters. The closing lines of her speech:

"To him I have offered hope for sacrifice And gave my longings as a sacrament. Who shall prohibit or hedge in his course, The wonderful, the charioteer, the swift? A traveller of the million roads of life, His steps familiar with the lights of heaven Tread without pain the sword-paved courts of hell; There he descends to edge eternal joy. Love's golden wings have power to fan thy void: The eyes of love gaze starlike through death's night, The feet of love tread naked hardest worlds. He labours in the depths, exults on the heights; He shall remake thy universe, O Death."

He shall remake thy universe, O Death. The claim that the central work of the cosmic age is the remaking of what Death holds — by love — is here put to him directly. Sri Aurobindo's Life Divine doctrine of the supramentalisation of matter is named, in Savitri's own register, as the answer to Death.

Death's fourth speech — I, Death, am He

Death's last speech of the canto is his most absolute claim. He begins by reducing Savitri's body, soul, and hope to surfaces:

"What is thy hope? to what dost thou aspire? This is thy body's sweetest lure of bliss, Assailed by pain, a frail precarious form… And thou, what art thou, soul, thou glorious dream Of brief emotions made and glittering thoughts, A thin dance of fireflies speeding through the night, A sparkling ferment in life's sunlit mire? Wilt thou claim immortality, O heart, Crying against the eternal witnesses That thou and he are endless powers and last?"

Then the theological claim, in its sharpest form:

"Death only lasts and the inconscient Void. I only am eternal and endure. I am the shapeless formidable Vast, I am the emptiness that men call Space, I am a timeless Nothingness carrying all, I am the Illimitable, the mute Alone. I, Death, am He; there is no other God. All from my depths are born, they live by death; All to my depths return and are no more."

I, Death, am He; there is no other God. This is the absolute Negation announcing its monopoly. Death names himself as Brahman — the One — under the aspect of pure negation. He extends the claim:

"The Gods to whom man prays can help not man; They are my imaginations and my moods Reflected in him by illusion's power. That which thou seest as thy immortal self Is a shadowy icon of my infinite, Is Death in thee dreaming of eternity. I am the Immobile in which all things move, I am the nude Inane in which they cease."

And then a subtle move — the concession about his own form:

"I have no body and no tongue to speak, I commune not with human eye and ear; Only thy thought gave a figure to my void. Because, O aspirant to divinity, Thou calledst me to wrestle with thy soul, I have assumed a face, a form, a voice."

Death admits that the figure speaking to her is something her own thought has evoked. This is doctrinally important: Death's personification is for her sake; the Reality behind him is faceless. He then names the only Being he will concede:

"But if there were a Being witnessing all, How should he help thy passionate desire? Aloof he watches sole and absolute, Indifferent to thy cry in nameless calm. His being is pure, unwounded, motionless, one. One endless watches the inconscient scene Where all things perish, as the foam the stars. The One lives for ever. There no Satyavan Changing was born and there no Savitri Claims from brief life her bribe of joy. There love Came never with his fretful eyes of tears, Nor Time is there nor the vain vasts of Space."

The Witness — the silent Self of the Upanishads — is invoked as indifferent. Death's case is that even if she will not concede his absolute claim, the only affirming Reality is the Witness, and the Witness is not on her side. The conclusion:

"If thou desirest immortality, Be then alone sufficient to thy soul: Live in thyself; forget the man thou lov'st. My last grand death shall rescue thee from life; Then shalt thou rise into thy unmoved source."

Death's final offer: the great liberation of the Vedantic tradition. Forget Satyavan, become sufficient to yourself, dissolve into the Witness. This is the highest offer he can make, and he is making it.

Savitri's fourth speech — the small reply

Her reply is the canto's shortest and one of its most concentrated:

"O Death, who reasonest, I reason not, Reason that scans and breaks, but cannot build Or builds in vain because she doubts her work. I am, I love, I see, I act, I will."

I am, I love, I see, I act, I will. Five verbs against the entire metaphysical apparatus. Savitri is not refuting Death's case; she is refusing the medium in which the case is made. Reason cannot reach what she stands on. She is. That is her answer.

Death's counter

Death's counter is precise:

"Know also. Knowing, thou shalt cease to love And cease to will, delivered from thy heart. So shalt thou rest for ever and be still, Consenting to the impermanence of things."

The classical mystical doctrine: when you know, love and will dissolve. Jñāna extinguishes bhakti and karma. He is offering the standard exit one last time.

Savitri's fifth speech — the cosmic identity

Her reply is the canto's hinge:

"When I have loved for ever, I shall know. Love in me knows the truth all changings mask. I know that knowledge is a vast embrace: I know that every being is myself, In every heart is hidden the myriad One. I know the calm Transcendent bears the world, The veiled Inhabitant, the silent Lord: I feel his secret act, his intimate fire; I hear the murmur of the cosmic Voice. I know my coming was a wave from God. For all his suns were conscient in my birth, And one who loves in us came veiled by death. Then was man born among the monstrous stars Dowered with a mind and heart to conquer thee."

This is the canto's central counter-doctrine. When I have loved for ever, I shall know. The order is reversed: not knowledge first then love-and-will dissolved, but love first and knowledge arriving as love's embrace. The case is then made:

The argument turns. Death himself is now characterised as the disguise the affirming Divine wears in order to make the cosmic project of self-overcoming possible. The Voice of Light's doctrine in Nirvana and the Discovery of the All-Negating Absolute — Matter is the Spirit's willing bride — is here being applied to Death.

Death's silence and his face

Death does not answer:

In the eternity of his ruthless will Sure of his empire and his armoured might, Like one disdaining violent helpless words From victim lips Death answered not again.

Sri Aurobindo gives him a brief description that, for the first time, names his iconography:

Half-seen in clouds appeared a sombre face; Night's dusk tiara was his matted hair, The ashes of the pyre his forehead's sign.

Matted hair, ashes of the pyre, Night's dusk tiara — this is unmistakably Shiva in his Mahakala form. The deathlord of the canto is recognisable as one of Hindu mythology's most central figures. The line is doing the doctrinal work the rest of the argument will rest on: Death is Shiva in his destroying mode. He is therefore part of the affirming cosmic order, not opposed to it. The Negation is one mask of the affirming One. This is the position Savitri's last speech reached, and the canto's iconography confirms it.

The closing

The canto ends with the three still travelling:

Once more a wanderer in the unending Night, Blindly forbidden by dead vacant eyes, She travelled through the dumb unhoping vasts. Around her rolled the shuddering waste of gloom, Its swallowing emptiness and joyless death Resentful of her thought and life and love. Through the long fading night by her compelled, Gliding half-seen on their unearthly path, Phantasmal in the dimness moved the three.

Through the long fading night by her compelled. She is now leading. Death is going somewhere because she has compelled him to. The first half of the argument is complete; the country of Eternal Night opens onto Book 10's Double Twilight, where the case will be resumed in a different register.

Connections

This canto continues Towards the Black Void and consummates the first round of the argument that will run through The Way of Fate and the Problem of Pain|Narad's preparatory work and across Books 10–11. Death's metaphysical case — I, Death, am He; there is no other God — is the most direct development of the Voice of Night in Nirvana and the Discovery of the All-Negating Absolute; the answer Savitri gives — one who loves in us came veiled by death — extends the Voice of Light's reply from that canto. The cosmic-consciousness claim every being is myself, in every heart is hidden the myriad One is the lived application of The Discovery of the Cosmic Spirit and the Cosmic Consciousness. The first boon — Dyumatsena's restoration — initiates the boon-pattern that will be extended in Books 10 and 11, ending in Satyavan's return. The image of Death as Shiva-Mahakala that closes the canto opens the doctrine that Death is an aspect of the One under negation, the central reading the rest of the epic confirms.

Open questions

Sources